The talking points that Planned Parenthood released days before Thanksgiving advising proponents on how to advocate for abortion at the Thanksgiving dinner table were misguided at best. At worst, it was incredibly bad timing. But, what about the timing of new reports that the Susan G. Komen Race for the Cure has had to suspend its relationship with Planned Parenthood – which gets badly needed funds from the charity to conduct breast cancer screenings – because Planned Parenthood is under investigation by the federal government. And why is Planned Parenthood under investigation? Because conservative Republicans are bowing to pressure from pro-lifers at the expense of the moderates who could define the next elections. 

Abortion is a very personal, spiritual consideration that one hopes no woman approaches in a cavalier way. Abortion is not, inherently, a political issue. But choice is a different story that has to do with a woman’s rights concerning her own body and that does have political implications.

We realize Mitt Romney needs to get through the primaries but boy, could this be a helpful thing for him to talk about in the general elections. Taking a nuanced stance on Planned Parenthood and acknowledging some of the still valid reasons that he was an early supporter, could help him pull those disaffected women who voted for Obama back into the Republican fold. Romney can go on saying that he is anti-embryonic stem cell research and personally opposed to abortion. Each of us knows at the end of the day we have to answer to our own conscience and he will be forgiven for that. But, he has a wonderful opportunity to frame himself as a Republican male who gets that Planned Parenthood does so much for women, who might not have access otherwise, that has nothing to do with abortion. On a practical level it offers birth control, cancer and std screenings and education. On a political level, it offers the Republican party the chance to say we care about women, even those marginalized by income, race or geography. Romney will have credibility on this issue if he takes a broad approach. After all, his own mother ran on a pro-choice platform in the 1970s. Just having a mother who was pro-choice will help him in the eyes of many women.

St. Louis Post Dispatch  – The nation’s leading breast-cancer charity, Susan G. Komen for the Cure, is halting its partnerships with Planned Parenthood affiliates – creating a bitter rift, linked to the abortion debate, between two iconic organizations that have assisted millions of women.

The change will mean a cutoff of hundreds of thousands of dollars in grants, mainly for breast exams.

Planned Parenthood says the move results from Komen bowing to pressure from anti-abortion activists. Komen says the key reason is that Planned Parenthood is under investigation in Congress – a probe launched by a conservative Republican who was urged to act by anti-abortion groups.

The rupture, which has not been publicly announced as it unfolded, is wrenching for some of those who’ve learned about it and admire both organizations.

“We’re kind of reeling,” said Patrick Hurd, who is CEO of Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Virginia – recipient of a 2010 grant from Komen – and whose wife, Betsi, is a veteran of several Komen fundraising races and is currently battling breast cancer.

“It sounds almost trite, going through this with Betsi, but cancer doesn’t care if you’re pro-choice, anti-choice, progressive, conservative,” Hurd said. “Victims of cancer could care less about people’s politics.”

Planned Parenthood said the Komen grants totaled roughly $680,000 last year and $580,000 the year before, going to at least 19 of its affiliates for breast-cancer screening and other breast-health services.

While Planned Parenthood affiliates in St. Louis have never received grants from Komen, the national decision to revoke funding was disappointing, said Paula Gianino, president of Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region and Southwest Missouri, where about 7,000 women receive breast exams each year.

Years ago, Planned Parenthood of St. Louis applied for and was denied a Komen grant to purchase breast self-exam shower cards, and Gianino said her organization has been discouraged from applying for grants ever since.

“We’re deeply disappointed and really saddened by the fact that the Komen foundation has succombed to this relentless, extreme pressure from anti-choice and anti-women’s groups putting politics over the lives and health of women in this country,” she said.

Komen spokeswoman Leslie Aun said the cutoff results from the charity’s newly adopted criteria barring grants to organizations that are under investigation by local, state or federal authorities. According to Komen, this applies to Planned Parenthood because it’s the focus of an inquiry launched by Rep. Cliff Stearns, R-Fla., seeking to determine whether public money was improperly spent on abortions.

Cecile Richards, president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, has depicted Stearns’ probe as politically motivated and said she was dismayed that it had contributed to Komen’s decision to halt the grants to PPFA affiliates.

“It’s hard to understand how an organization with whom we share a mission of saving women’s lives could have bowed to this kind of bullying,” Richards told The Associated Press. “It’s really hurtful.”

Planned Parenthood has been a perennial target of protests, boycotts and funding cutoffs because of its role as the largest provider of abortions in the United States. Its nearly 800 health centers nationwide provide an array of other services, including birth control, testing for sexually transmitted diseases, and cancer screening.

According to Planned Parenthood, its centers performed more than 4 million breast exams over the past five years, including nearly 170,000 as a result of Komen grants.

In a 2010 statement about its ties to Planned Parenthood, Komen’s chief scientific adviser said “while Komen affliates provide funds to pay for screening, education and treatment programs in dozens of communities, in some areas, the only place that poor, uninsured or under-insured women can receive these services are through programs run by Planned Parenthood.”

Komen, founded in 1982, has invested more than $1.9 billion since then in breast-cancer research, health services and advocacy. Its Race for the Cure fundraising events have become a global phenomenon.

For all its mainstream popularity, however, Komen has been a target of anti-abortion groups since it began its partnerships with Planned Parenthood in 2005.

Life Decisions International includes Komen on its “boycott list” of companies and organizations that support or collaborate with Planned Parenthood. In December, Lifeway Christian Resources, the publishing division of the Southern Baptist Convention announced a recall of pink Bibles it had sold because some of the money generated for Komen was being routed to Planned Parenthood.

In 2010, the Archdiocese of St. Louis discouraged its parishes from participating in the annual Komen 5K event that attracts more than 60,000 runners downtown each June.

Aun, the Komen spokeswoman, said pressure tactics were not the reason for the funding cutoff and cited Stearns’ House investigation as a key factor.

That investigation, which has no set timetable, was launched in September when Stearns asked Planned Parenthood for more than a decade’s worth of documents.

Stearns, in a statement emailed to the AP on Monday, said he is still working with Planned Parenthood on getting the requested documents. He said he is looking into possible violations of state and local reporting requirements, as well as allegations of financial abuse, and would consider holding a hearing depending on what he learns.

Many of the allegations were outlined in a report presented to Stearns last year by Americans United for Life, a national anti-abortion group, which urged him to investigate.

Democrats and Planned Parenthood supporters have assailed the probe as an unwarranted political ploy.

Komen, while not publicly announcing its decision to halt the grants, has conveyed the news to its 100-plus U.S. affiliates. Richards said she was informed via a phone call from Komen’s president, Elizabeth Thompson, in December.

“It was incredibly surprising,” Richards said. “It wasn’t even a conversation – it was an announcement.”

Richards subsequently sent a letter to Komen’s top leaders – CEO Nancy Brinker and board chairman Dr. LaSalle D. Leffall, Jr. – requesting a meeting with the board and asserting that Komen had misrepresented Planned Parenthood’s funding-eligibility status in some states.

According to Planned Parenthood, the Komen leaders replied to Richards with a brief letter ignoring the request for a meeting, defending the new grant criteria, and adding, “We understand the disappointment of any organization that is affected by these policy and strategy updates.”

Aun, in a telephone interview, said Komen was not accusing Planned Parenthood of any wrongdoing.

“We want to maintain a positive relationship with them,” she said. “We’re not making any judgment.”

Richards said Planned Parenthood is intent on raising funds quickly to replace the lost grants so that women in need do not go without breast-screening services. Already, the family foundation of Dallas oilman/philanthropist Lee Fikes and his wife, Amy, has donated $250,000 for this purpose, Planned Parenthood said.

The Komen decision was perplexing to Dottie Lamm, a Denver newspaper columnist and breast cancer survivor. She has done fundraising for Planned Parenthood, participated in several Races for the Cure, and serves on an honorary advisory council for the local Komen affiliate.

“It really makes me sad,” said Lamm, wife of former Colorado Gov. Richard Lamm. “I kind of suspect there’s a political agenda that got to Komen … I hope it can be worked out.”

Stephanie Kight, a vice president with Planned Parenthood of Orange and San Bernardino Counties, said her affiliate in Southern California received a Komen grant for 2011 and was able to obtain an additional grant of $120,000 for 2012 by signing the deal with its local Komen counterpart just before Komen’s new criteria took effect. Under the criteria, no further grants will be allowed unless the pending House inquiry is resolved in Planned Parenthood’s favor.

Kight said her conversations with local Komen leaders indicated there was a shared sense of frustration over the national Komen decision.

“One of the things these organizations share is the trust of women across the United States,” Kight said. “That’s what we’re concerned about – not losing the trust of these women, who turn to both of us at their most difficult moments.”