Moderate Moment | Moderate Moms
Who is patronizing us now?

Who is patronizing us now?

The Democrats are loading the campaign cannons with another cannonball aimed at blowing up the issue of women’s rights in this Election year.  This time it’s the Violence against Women Act.  We are happy that Missouri’s Sen. Roy Blunt recognizes that Republicans will have to come up with some kind of alternate if they don’t like the Democrats’ version of this bill. The bill supports battered women’s programs which are hard to argue against. The bigger concern for me is the obvious way that the Democrats are baiting the Republicans with women’s issues in an Election year. I am not going to say that all Republican men get women’s issues because it’s clear that many of them don’t. But, we can say with certainty that moderate Republican women do get women’s issues. In fact, most of the ones I meet or talk to are in favor of birth control, choice and stem cell research.

Republican women could easily be swayed into thinking the economy is better now and that the Republican agenda to focus on the deficit, reform entitlement programs and create jobs is no longer a pressing need, which it is. Three term Senator Olympia Snowe’s departure was a setback for moderate Republican women. And many moderate Republican women may be left wondering if they can vote Republican with all this talk about the merits of contraception and cutting education programs.  But, Ann Romney said it best when she said the economy is still the main concern for Republican women, who refuse to be patronized not only by their own party but especially by the other side.

This is a great article from today’s New York Times:

Women Figure Anew in Senate’s Latest Battle

Stephen Crowley/The New York Times

“We’re mad, and we’re tired of it,” said Senator Maria Cantwell.

By

WASHINGTON — With emotions still raw from the fight over President Obama’s contraception mandate, Senate Democrats are beginning a push to renew the Violence Against Women Act, the once broadly bipartisan 1994 legislation that now faces fierce opposition from conservatives.

The Election 2012 App

The Election 2012 App

A one-stop destination for the latest political news — from The Times and other top sources. Plus opinion, polls, campaign data and video.

Readers’ Comments

The fight over the law, which would expand financing for and broaden the reach of domestic violence programs, will be joined Thursday when Senate Democratic women plan to march to the Senate floor to demand quick action on its extension. Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the majority leader, has suggested he will push for a vote by the end of March.

Democrats, confident they have the political upper hand with women, insist that Republican opposition falls into a larger picture of insensitivity toward women that has progressed from abortion fights to contraception to preventive health care coverage — and now to domestic violence.

“I am furious,” said Senator Maria Cantwell, Democrat of Washington. “We’re mad, and we’re tired of it.”

Republicans are bracing for a battle where substantive arguments could be swamped by political optics and the intensity of the clash over women’s issues. At a closed-door Senate Republican lunch on Tuesday, Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska sternly warned her colleagues that the party was at risk of being successfully painted as antiwoman — with potentially grievous political consequences in the fall, several Republican senators said Wednesday.

Some conservatives are feeling trapped.

“I favor the Violence Against Women Act and have supported it at various points over the years, but there are matters put on that bill that almost seem to invite opposition,” said Senator Jeff Sessions, Republican of Alabama, who opposed the latest version last month in the Judiciary Committee. “You think that’s possible? You think they might have put things in there we couldn’t support that maybe then they could accuse you of not being supportive of fighting violence against women?”

The legislation would continue existing grant programs to local law enforcement and battered women shelters, but would expand efforts to reach Indian tribes and rural areas. It would increase the availability of free legal assistance to victims of domestic violence, extend the definition of violence against women to include stalking, and provide training for civil and criminal court personnel to deal with families with a history of violence. It would also allow more battered illegal immigrants to claim temporary visas, and would include same-sex couples in programs for domestic violence.

Republicans say the measure, under the cloak of battered women, unnecessarily expands immigration avenues by creating new definitions for immigrant victims to claim battery. More important, they say, it fails to put in safeguards to ensure that domestic violence grants are being well spent. It also dilutes the focus on domestic violence by expanding protections to new groups, like same-sex couples, they say.

Critics of the legislation acknowledged that the name alone presents a challenge if they intend to oppose it over some of its specific provisions.

“Obviously, you want to be for the title,” Senator Roy Blunt of Missouri, a member of the Republican leadership, said of the Violence Against Women Act. “If Republicans can’t be for it, we need to have a very convincing alternative.”

The latest Senate version of the bill has five Republican co-sponsors, including Michael D. Crapo of Idaho, a co-author, but it failed to get a single Republican vote in the Judiciary Committee last month.

As suggested by Mr. Sessions, Republicans detect a whiff of politics in the Democrats’ timing. The party just went through a bruising fight over efforts to replace the Obama administration’s contraception-coverage mandate with legislation allowing some employers to opt out of coverage for medical procedures they object to on religious or moral grounds.


Leave a Reply

Comment moderation is enabled, no need to resubmit any comments posted.